Jump to content
Whatbird Community

smittyone@cox.net

Members
  • Posts

    445
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

smittyone@cox.net last won the day on January 18

smittyone@cox.net had the most liked content!

3 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

smittyone@cox.net's Achievements

464

Reputation

  1. This bird is part of the same group I originally posted. It's unquestionably an adult female. If bird No. 1 is a non-breeding male, and bird Nos. 2 and 3 fall somewhere in between bird No. 1 and bird No. 4, would that make them immature males? I'm assuming a non-breeding and an immature bird are not one and the same.
  2. I came across a large flock of Red-winged Blackbirds today in western Iowa. The first pic I believe is a non-breeding male. Are the 2nd and 3rd birds both adult females?
  3. This quartet of Trumpeter Swans were seen last week in NW Missouri. Are all 4 of them cygnets? I know adult Trumpeter Swans are not always pure white. Their feathers can be stained depending on their food source. But that staining is generally limited to their head and neck. The flight feathers on at least 3 of these birds are darker, leading me to believe at least 3 of them are immature birds. Follow-up question--are young swans called cygnets all the way up until they're adults, or only until they grow flight feathers?
  4. When I say No Bueno to calling them all non-breeding adults, I mean that I'm personally against lumping them ALL that way when I report them. If I can identify their sex, then I'll try to do that. If I cannot determine their sex, then I'm fine with calling them non-breeding adults. This is only my personal preference, and the way I try to report birds that I photograph. Of course everyone else can report them as they like.
  5. Yesterday I encountered three different large flocks of Horned Larks in western Iowa. Each flock also had a sizeable number of Snow Buntings embedded within them. This is a new lifer bird for me (Yeah!). I understand this time of year, I'm likely to only see non-breeding males and non-breeding females. According to Cornel Labs "All About Birds", my primary go-to site for bird ID, non-breeding males are white below, with rusty patches on the head, "ear", and shoulders. Its back is dark and streaky. Non-breeding females are white below, with rusty patches on the head, "ear", and chest. The back is dark with rusty streaks. When the flock takes off together, it's easy to tell them apart. On the ground however, I'm having a tough time differentiating them. It's unlikely that every one I photographed are all males or all females. Are there other features I'm missing, or am I looking too hard. Calling them all non-breeding adults is no bueno.
  6. Been having a tough time getting decent eagle pics with these lousy clouds. So here's one from the archives from a nice sunny day.
  7. Captured this today under cloudy skies. Not in the same league as pictaker's Grey Ghost, but it's definitely one of my best shots of one.
  8. I can identify immature Northern Harriers when their breasts are buffy and devoid of any streaking. But on many occasions I've come across buffy breasted individuals who have moderate streaking, and sometimes even blotchy breasts. These "in between" birds I've been calling immature/adult female. Are you saying any amount of streaking makes it an adult female? And I rarely get images clear enough to positively identify eye color.
  9. This adult male Northern Cardinal was seen in NW Missouri a few days ago. I noticed while editing photos today that he had a greyish back. Is he molting? Or is this something else? I know it's not light refracting off his feathers since it was overcast. I don't recall noticing this on other Cardinals I've photographed over the years.
  10. If I come upon a bird and I'm already close, I grab the camera first. But if it's far away, I grab the binoculars first. Although my camera has much better reach, the binoculars have a wider field of view, making it easier to find the bird. With the camera, sometimes it's like finding something by looking through a straw. The binoculars also have a brighter view in lower light conditions. The camera requires settings changes to make the view bright enough under those conditions. The binoculars also allow one handed use. I can never do that with my camera.
  11. It's upside down on the opposite side. Why is it that way? Dunno. Maybe for situations such as this?
  12. I've already stated I'm a photographer first. But I have to admit, through that hobby, I'm becoming a birder. When my backyard feeders no longer inspired me, I began to expand my search area, actively looking for something different besides "feeder birds" Once I photographed my first Bald Eagle, I was hooked. Now I actively seek out birds (particularly any raptor), and always try to get better photos of birds I've already photographed. Then I made a list... I think if you keep a bird list, you're automatically a birder.
  13. Photographer first. Here's a different kind of bird. Apologies if this isn't allowed.
  14. Remarkable photo. Not just because of the sharpness and detail. But because I rarely encounter Grey Ghosts, and when I do, they're never close enough to even think of getting a shot like this. I'm super envious.
×
×
  • Create New...