Jump to content
Whatbird Community

smittyone@cox.net

Members
  • Posts

    386
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by smittyone@cox.net

  1. 12 hours ago, Jerry Friedman said:

    I'll just add that it is a dark-morph Red-tailed Hawk--a dark morph of the Harlan's subspecies, not a dark morph of the Western (or Northern) subspecies.

    I'm not smart enough to argue whether a Harlan's is a sub-species of Red-tailed Hawk, or just a color morph.  All I know is that a dark-morph RTHA and a Harlan's RTHA look different from each other.  Your statement above, confuses me though.  Perhaps it's just the way it's worded.  Are you agreeing that this is a Harlan's RTHA, and at the same time, implying that Harlan's are just a "different" dark morph RTHA than a typical dark-morph RTHA?  I'm not trying to be argumentative--I genuinely don't understand what you are saying above. 

  2. Seen today at Loess Bluffs NWR, in NW Missouri.  The light streaking on this immature buteo's  body, and splotchy markings on the wings, suggest to me that this is a Harlan's RTHA.  But, I understand the leg feathers on a Harlan's extend farther down the leg (not RLHA length), than on Red-tailed Hawks.  I see a lot of leg showing on this bird.  I also think I see just a hint of dark trailing edge on the wing feathers, but this is a young bird, so...

    I've brought up the "Dark morph RTH vs Harlan's" here before, yet I still struggle with it.  Am I concentrating on the little details and missing something obvious?

      

    DSC05932a.jpg

  3. There are three very dark brown buteos consistently seen at Loess Bluffs NWR in NW Missouri lately.  I've submitted two of them here for identification--both were ID'd as dark morph Harlan's RTHA.  This is the third dark buteo, seen yesterday.  Based on the lack of, what I call "white splotches or polka dots", I believe this bird is an immature dark morph Red-tailed Hawk, and not a Harlan's RTHA.  Am I  correct?  I have plenty of shots from every angle, if additional pics are needed.   

    DSC02065a.jpg

    DSC02165a.jpg

    DSC02199a.jpg

    • Like 1
  4. Spotted this (taiga) Merlin yesterday afternoon in NW Missouri.  Despite the blue sky background, the sun had gone behind a cloud resulting in underexposed pics.  Even after brightening up in post processing, I'm not certain if the upper wing and tail feathers are slate gray or dark brown.  Are those the only distinguishing features between a male and female Taiga Merlin?

    DSC06149a.jpg

    DSC06088a.jpg

    DSC06152a.jpg

    DSC06154a.jpg

    • Like 5
  5. The Bald Eagle link you provided is the best I've seen so far.  Thank you very much Meghann.  

    As a follow-up question, has anyone ever referred to young Bald Eagles as sub-adults?  I don't think it's an officially recognized term, but I've used it on occasion, to describe immature Bald Eagles that show most of the visible features of an adult.  I reserve it's use to 3 1/2+ year old birds with mostly white head and tail feathers.

  6. Someone already explained this to me a while back, but unfortunately it didn't stick (I forgot).  I would call this an immature Bald Eagle, but have seen it also called a juvenile.  I'm guilty of this myself.  Both terms seem to be used interchangeably, but I know one is technically correct.  Can someone please explain, in simple terms, what the difference is, which one would be (more) correct for this young eagle, and why?  Maybe provide a couple of examples, so maybe the info will stick this time.  Although this is still kind of an ID question, moderators, please move this post to a different section, if appropriate.

    DSC06854a.jpg

  7. This Northern Rough-legged Hawk was seen Monday and Tuesday at Loess Bluffs NWR near Mound City, MO.  Can it be further identified beyond RLHA, by date/location if it is an adult or juvenile bird?  Can it's gender and/or color morph be identified by plumage alone?  I don't believe there are subspecies to Rough-legged Hawks, but I'd love to be able to further identify if it's an adult or a juvenile, male or female, and light or dark morph.  Although many birders would be satisfied with just the basic ID, I obsess over trying to identify subspecies, etc., especially buteos.  Based on eye color alone, I'd guess this is probably a juvenile.  If it helps with identification, I have upper side shots as well, but they're much farther away and less detailed.

    DSC08925a.jpg

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...