Charlie Spencer Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Birding Boy said: I think they’re talking about this Willet photo https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/356825621 Oh, that's a 3. Underexposed and a teensy weensy bit fuzzy. Good pose but nothing special. Edited August 5, 2021 by Charlie Spencer 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quiscalus quiscula Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 29 minutes ago, Birding Boy said: I think they’re talking about this Willet photo https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/356825621 Yes, that's right. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seanbirds Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 4?!? https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/227346791?_gl=1*i7l09o*_ga*MTYzMzg1Mzc1OS4xNjI3NDk2Nzcz*_ga_QR4NVXZ8BM*MTYyODE4NDcxNC4xMy4xLjE2MjgxODQ3MjguNDY.#_ga=2.15226229.293692493.1627910042-1633853759.1627496773 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BirdNrd Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 4? https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/77453931?_gl=1*16bq533*_ga*MTE2OTE5NDUyMC4xNTgzMjA0NjMx*_ga_QR4NVXZ8BM*MTYyODE4NjU2My4xNzguMS4xNjI4MTg3NzU1LjQz#_ga=2.126846538.69443595.1627672545-1169194520.1583204631 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quiscalus quiscula Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 1 hour ago, Seanbirds said: 4?!? https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/227346791?_gl=1*i7l09o*_ga*MTYzMzg1Mzc1OS4xNjI3NDk2Nzcz*_ga_QR4NVXZ8BM*MTYyODE4NDcxNC4xMy4xLjE2MjgxODQ3MjguNDY.#_ga=2.15226229.293692493.1627910042-1633853759.1627496773 What do you mean, too low or too high? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quiscalus quiscula Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 55 minutes ago, BirdNrd said: 4? https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/77453931?_gl=1*16bq533*_ga*MTE2OTE5NDUyMC4xNTgzMjA0NjMx*_ga_QR4NVXZ8BM*MTYyODE4NjU2My4xNzguMS4xNjI4MTg3NzU1LjQz#_ga=2.126846538.69443595.1627672545-1169194520.1583204631 Again, too low or too high? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BirdNrd Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 1 minute ago, Quiscalus quiscula said: Again, too low or too high? Too high IMO. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quiscalus quiscula Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 1 minute ago, BirdNrd said: Too high IMO. Didn't rate this one, but seems fair to me. Then again, I tend to rate things higher than others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seanbirds Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 9 minutes ago, BirdNrd said: Too high IMO. Agreed. Two or three. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seanbirds Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 12 minutes ago, Quiscalus quiscula said: What do you mean, too low or too high? Way too high. It’s worth a 2, IMO. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quiscalus quiscula Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 Just now, Seanbirds said: Way too high. It’s worth a 2, IMO. I'm not sure, it is in focus. Also, hehehe, I rated it?. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BirdNrd Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 6 minutes ago, Seanbirds said: Way too high. It’s worth a 2, IMO. I agree. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IKLland Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 I got a five star( happy with ) and a three star on this. Is this really a three? https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/360114071 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BirdNrd Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 9 minutes ago, IKLland said: I got a five star( happy with ) and a three star on this. Is this really a three? https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/360114071 5 star photo IMO. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BirdNrd Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 4? Someone rated it a 1 which is why I'm asking. https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/359908881 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seanbirds Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 High 4 or maybe 5, IMO. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quiscalus quiscula Posted August 9, 2021 Share Posted August 9, 2021 Just now, Seanbirds said: High 4 or maybe 5, IMO. Same. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IKLland Posted August 11, 2021 Share Posted August 11, 2021 On 8/9/2021 at 10:59 AM, IKLland said: I got a five star( happy with ) and a three star on this. Is this really a three? https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/360114071 Why’s the average 4? Did someone give it one maybe? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IKLland Posted August 11, 2021 Share Posted August 11, 2021 On 8/9/2021 at 11:59 AM, BirdNrd said: 4? Someone rated it a 1 which is why I'm asking. https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/359908881 It’s a great photo. Two things for me make it a hit 4. Since it’s in a birdbath, it doesn’t seem like a natural placement to me. However, since it’s such a sharp shot, that doesn’t make too much of a difference, you know maybe something to debate over. However, the main thing for me is that you cut off the tail. If the entire tail was in the photo, I’d likely give it a five. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IKLland Posted August 12, 2021 Share Posted August 12, 2021 4? It still got to the top photos!. But, why not 5? https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/360568511 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seanbirds Posted August 12, 2021 Share Posted August 12, 2021 1 minute ago, IKLland said: 4? It still got to the top photos!. But, why not 5? https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/360568511 I’ll bet anything it got bombed. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Spencer Posted August 12, 2021 Share Posted August 12, 2021 8 hours ago, IKLland said: 4? It still got to the top photos!. But, why not 5? https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/360568511 It's a bit closely-cropped for my tastes. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IKLland Posted August 12, 2021 Share Posted August 12, 2021 3 hours ago, Charlie Spencer said: It's a bit closely-cropped for my tastes. Thanks. I thought so too, but I had to edit from this to get it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevor L. Posted August 15, 2021 Author Share Posted August 15, 2021 I mean, it's not good. I think it's a 4, but someone gave it a 1. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quiscalus quiscula Posted August 15, 2021 Share Posted August 15, 2021 5 hours ago, Trevor L. said: I mean, it's not good. I think it's a 4, but someone gave it a 1. I agree with four. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.