Jump to content
Whatbird Community

Review Bombing


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, PalmWarbler said:

Not related to the topic but how does ebird know what kind of camera I have and all of that camera-related stuff?

The metadata/exif info, all that camera related stuff, is a digital note attached to the file when you take the picture. It usually stays with the file but is not always visible. As an example, a photo uploaded to Whatbird doesn't show the exif info, but the same image uploaded to Macaulay does.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, PalmWarbler said:

Not related to the topic but how does ebird know what kind of camera I have and all of that camera-related stuff?

If you use Windows' built-in File Manager, click the View tab and then the 'Details pane' button.  You'll get a windows on the right side of the screen that shows most of the metadata for the selected file.  This is also a good place to assign tags to a file.  Most people think you need a separate application for this, but nope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, PalmWarbler said:

?

'Go figure' - an older expression, short for 'Go ahead and try to figure out what's going on if you wish, but it will be a waste of your time.'

See also 'What's up with that?'

Edited by Charlie Spencer
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How I rate photos-

5 stars- subject in clear focus, you could expect to see it on an audubon bird calendar.

4 stars- still quite good, but something is just not quite right- would have been okay if one thing would have been corrected, eg. not quite in focus, a branch over the wrong area, part of the bird cut off.

3 stars- picture is a little hard to identify, but still doable. eg. bad lighting, far away.

2 stars- Only an expert can identify this photo! The blurry blob flying away.

1 star- Where's the bird? Oh, you mean that little speck in the sky?

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, PalmWarbler said:

Definitely not 'bombing', but:

Apparently this is five stars... seems more like a 3 to me. https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/358600471

I have no problem with 4 for this kingbird.

I wish there was an option to search / sort by most frequently rated.  I value a 4 more when it's the result of seven or eight ratings, instead of one or two.

Edited by Charlie Spencer
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Bird Nuts said:

How could you tell someone rated it 1 star?  Were there not as many ratings as there are now?

Yes, and if someone would have rated the photo a 1 it would drop down to a 4, but if you rated it 2 or higher it would have still been an average of 5.

Edited by BirdNrd
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, The Bird Nuts said:

It's much too small in the frame for a four-star photo.  There is no feather detail.

Are you and QQ talking about the same junco photo?  I see a ton of detail, and agree about the framing; it needs a bit more room between the tail and right edge.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...