Jump to content
Whatbird Community

Share Your Best Photo of the Day


Message added by aveschapinas,

Folks: it's not OK to take other people's photos to edit and re-post. Just like we don't correct each other's spelling and grammar, we don't take it upon ourselves to decide that someone's photo needs correction. In addition, as has been emphasized before, you need to respect copyright.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 13k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

15 hours ago, Avery said:

Now I have gotta ask, what settings did you use? I haven’t  been able to get photos that Sharp yet with my new similar camera. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IKLland said:

Now I have gotta ask, what settings did you use? I haven’t  been able to get photos that Sharp yet with my new similar camera. 

I usually keep the aperture at about 5.6, and I didn’t have to change it for this. It was cloudy, so I had to use a slower shutter speed, 1/125. The ISO I have on auto. 
 

It also helped that they did not care that I was there. I army crawled on the bridge to about 4 feet away and was taking pictures from in between the floorboards and the bottom of the railing. So cool!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Birding Boy said:

I like the flycatcher, those are kinda tough to photograph.

Agree 100%. Catbirds and Red-wingeds are much more camera friendly, flycatchers (excluding Phoebes) tend to keep their distance. I sense a new thread coming on - most difficult/easiest birds to photograph, or maybe not.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Birding Boy said:

I like the flycatcher, those are kinda tough to photograph.

 

59 minutes ago, RobinHood said:

Agree 100%. Catbirds and Red-wingeds are much more camera friendly, flycatchers (excluding Phoebes) tend to keep their distance. I sense a new thread coming on - most difficult/easiest birds to photograph, or maybe not.

Thanks.  It's my best shot of a Least.  It had been chasing another LEFL, so it was distracted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, lonestranger said:

Is it safe to say that it's also the closest you've gotten to a bird you were photographing?

If the connection isn't obvious, it should be. ?

 

23 hours ago, Avery said:

It also helped that they did not care that I was there. I army crawled on the bridge to about 4 feet away and was taking pictures from in between the floorboards and the bottom of the railing. So cool!

Absolutely, 100% correct. The sharpest shots I get are from birds that are very close, or close enough to see well with the naked eye, and in good lighting. My camera CAN take sharp, good photos, but the circumstances required rarely present themselves. Another instance of this can be seen here, where I literally sat in a chair under the feeders for half an hour and waited for the birds to return.

https://ebird.org/checklist/S74731620?_gl=1*17skv0h*_ga*Njg0OTM1NDk5LjE1ODI4NDA4NjI.*_ga_QR4NVXZ8BM*MTYyMDY2MDYzOC44LjEuMTYyMDY2MDY3My4yNQ..#_ga=2.57012138.1026803051.1620510832-684935499.1582840862

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...