Jump to content
Whatbird Community

Share Your Best Photo of the Day


Message added by aveschapinas,

Folks: it's not OK to take other people's photos to edit and re-post. Just like we don't correct each other's spelling and grammar, we don't take it upon ourselves to decide that someone's photo needs correction. In addition, as has been emphasized before, you need to respect copyright.

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, blackburnian said:

Edited the catbird. 
 

https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/437914631

Here’s a tip. When framing, don’t cut off the tail. It makes the bird look amputated. Awesome shot though! Headshots are different, though. If it’s just a headshot, it’s fine. But if the whole bird is there except for one thing, it’s annoying. 
 

 

Super nice lighting and sharpness, however! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, IKLland said:

Here’s a tip. When framing, don’t cut off the tail. It makes the bird look amputated. Awesome shot though! Headshots are different, though. If it’s just a headshot, it’s fine. But if the whole bird is there except for one thing, it’s annoying. 
 

 

Super nice lighting and sharpness, however! 

For example, this one you have up is a lot better in terms of framing it, IMO

https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/437862591

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IKLland said:

Here’s a tip. When framing, don’t cut off the tail. It makes the bird look amputated. Awesome shot though! Headshots are different, though. If it’s just a headshot, it’s fine. But if the whole bird is there except for one thing, it’s annoying. 
 

 

Super nice lighting and sharpness, however! 

I agree with you. But at 400 it wasn’t possible to get the full bird in the frame. Too close. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IKLland said:

Here’s a tip. When framing, don’t cut off the tail. It makes the bird look amputated. Awesome shot though! Headshots are different, though. If it’s just a headshot, it’s fine. But if the whole bird is there except for one thing, it’s annoying. 
 

 

Super nice lighting and sharpness, however! 

It looks to me like the tail was cut off by being on the other side of the feeder platform, not from cropping. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, blackburnian said:

I agree with you. But at 400 it wasn’t possible to get the full bird in the frame. Too close. 

Ummm, at 400mm you could have reduced the zoom to 300mm, or less, couldn't you? ? I know, I know, I tend to forget that my zoom lens has a short end too. ?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, lonestranger said:

I think we all know that type of situation all too well. Sometimes we have to take what we get, which in this case is still a nice photo. ?

You’re absolutely right though. I tend to shoot at 400 almost all the time, often forgetting or ignoring that there are shorter options. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...