Jump to content
Whatbird Community

Feedback on editing attempts.


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, IKLland said:

Screenshot of raw file (hence the poor resolution)

7ED806D5-3322-4EF4-A2A5-CEB675BF85A2.thumb.jpeg.4f821a661582a2bda328888b79c17e92.jpeg

Final edited photo, processed through Remini and photoshop express on my iPad. 
thoughts appreciated! 
 

Embedded from eBird, and below it is a link to the full resolution version.

1800
 

Full resolution: 

That looks insane!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, IKLland said:

Screenshot of raw file (hence the poor resolution)

7ED806D5-3322-4EF4-A2A5-CEB675BF85A2.thumb.jpeg.4f821a661582a2bda328888b79c17e92.jpeg

Final edited photo, processed through Remini and photoshop express on my iPad. 
thoughts appreciated! 
 

Embedded from eBird, and below it is a link to the full resolution version.

1800
 

It's a nice flight shot photo, but personally I think it's way too over processed. When zoomed in, the facial patterning and the flight feathers lose so much detail that they start to appear as if the image was drawn digitally, versus an actual photo.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, IKLland said:

Screenshot of raw file (hence the poor resolution)

7ED806D5-3322-4EF4-A2A5-CEB675BF85A2.thumb.jpeg.4f821a661582a2bda328888b79c17e92.jpeg

Final edited photo, processed through Remini and photoshop express on my iPad. 
thoughts appreciated! 
 

Embedded from eBird, and below it is a link to the full resolution version.

1800
 

I'm not sure that sharing your photos from iCloud has any benefit, @IKLland. I can only see part of the photo on iCloud unless I download it, it does not show me the full resolution image when clicked on. Clicking on your embedded photo from Cornell on the other hand, enlarges it here in Whatbird and a second click takes me to the full resolution image on Cornell's website, where I can enlarge it even further without the need for downloading it. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, lonestranger said:

I'm not sure that sharing your photos from iCloud has any benefit, @IKLland. I can only see part of the photo on iCloud unless I download it, it does not show me the full resolution image when clicked on. Clicking on your embedded photo from Cornell on the other hand, enlarges it here in Whatbird and a second click takes me to the full resolution image on Cornell's website, where I can enlarge it even further without the need for downloading it. 

My mistake, clicking on the little thumbnail shows the full image on iCloud. Still no benefit in using iCloud when the embedded ebird image takes you to the full resolution image anyways.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had trouble with green-winged teal face patches being blue. Nikon had me change the metering, that didn't help. Another photographer said that it may be because of the very blue sky and abundance of blue light. Anyone have any thoughts?

DSC_0112a.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jayD said:

I have had trouble with green-winged teal face patches being blue. Nikon had me change the metering, that didn't help. Another photographer said that it may be because of the very blue sky and abundance of blue light. Anyone have any thoughts?

I think it has a lot to due with the angle at which the light strikes the feathers / angle at which the light is reflected.  Blues on a bird aren't due to pigment, they're entirely due to reflection; some greens too, to a lesser extent. 

Your only option is to physically shifting position so you see the bird from another angle, or hope the bird changes direction.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with @Charlie Spencer, @jayD. I think the blue we see in the photo is more from the angle of light on the bird than any settings in the camera throwing off the colours. Mallards are another bird that often have blue colours when the sun hits their green head from certain angles.

If you think it's a camera problem, I suggest finding a colour chart and doing a few tests to see how accurately your camera captures the colours before you go investing in a new camera. It might be a problem with the camera or it's settings, but I suspect it's just a change of colour due to the angle of light.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
32 minutes ago, Charlie Spencer said:

The breast, neck, and belly feathers are a little oversharpened for my tastes, but I assume that was necessary to get the colors out of the branch's shadow.

The oversharpening is something I noticed too. Weird thing is that it doesn’t look like that when I view the file on my photos app—only when I upload it here or to eBird. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
1 hour ago, Tanager 101 said:

Original: 

IMG_8152.thumb.JPG.431509c407b4adafc7203c26d7b0fb6a.JPG

Edited:

Ring-billedGull2.thumb.jpg.18f5b2ebac00073bfd2f842da98d5af3.jpg

Thoughts?

I got whatever photo editor @IKLland uses (the free one) question on that: If I start shooting in RAW will I have to pay to edit photos? Or will I still get to use it for free?

If you start trying to edit RAW photos on that app, you will have to pay. I believe you can pay monthly, but I pay annually. Annually it’s $35, monthly it’s $4.99 a month. 
 

I agree with @Charlie Spencer, in this case I would’ve selectively brightened the eye, and lifted the overall exposure a little rather than the shadows slider. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, IKLland said:

If you start trying to edit RAW photos on that app, you will have to pay. I believe you can pay monthly, but I pay annually. Annually it’s $35, monthly it’s $4.99 a month. 
 

I agree with @Charlie Spencer, in this case I would’ve selectively brightened the eye, and lifted the overall exposure a little rather than the shadows slider. 

How do you just brighten the eye? I haven't seen that option...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to me I am seeing way to many over edited photos, over sharpened, over saturated, too bright etc. Once they get that surreal looked to them....it's time to back off the sliders. Opinions will very but that is my take. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chris Clem said:

It seems to me I am seeing way to many over edited photos, over sharpened, over saturated, too bright etc. Once they get that surreal looked to them....it's time to back off the sliders. Opinions will very but that is my take. 

To be honest I really agree with this most of the time (even though I am 100% guilty of doing it myself)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Tanager 101 said:

computer (laptop to be a little more specific)

Then I’m not exactly sure how to get to it, however there should be a selection tool somewhere. When you get to it,  create a new selection using the brush tool that will be next to it. Have that selection selected, and as long as you leave it on that, the edits you make will only be applied to that area. To go back and be able to edit the whole image again, click off of that selection back onto the “full” selection. There may be YouTube videos and google reviews on how to do this as well.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...