Jump to content
Whatbird Community

Feedback on editing attempts.


Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, BlueJay said:

Looks good! I may suggest cropping to something like this, but everything else looks perfect! Nice bird! 

Note that the quality of this isn’t as good here on whatbird, as it’s not embedded from ebird. 76162EAF-D057-4490-B1C0-2C85278E1785.thumb.jpeg.feb546846d980540536117404966e59b.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/16/2022 at 2:32 PM, Charlie Spencer said:

What came out of the camera.  Cropping on the photos here wasn't an artistic decision; there's a white spot on the post I'm using as a common lower left point for these experiments.

DSC00596.JPG

This is my attempt at the edit.  I am at work so I don't have my full set of tools and I did a quick copy and paste from this post

 

 

purple pinch edit1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, BlueJay said:

Do you have a protective filter attached to your lens, @BlueJay? I ask because of the way the texture (for lack of a better word) of the background looks. If you do have a lens filter attached, I'd suggest removing it and comparing some similarly composed photos with and without the filter. While I like the idea of an extra layer of protection on a lens, I have found that I don't like the effect the filter has on my images. If you don't have a lens filter attached, this won't apply to you but maybe others might consider whether a protective lens is worth it. I was always in favour of attaching a lens filter as soon as I bought a new lens, until I took the filter off and noticed the difference, particularly in the backgrounds. If you, or anyone else, has never used a lens without a filter attached to it, I'd suggest trying without a filter for comparison. 

I like your edit over the original and think you did a good job. I'd suggest cropping a little to make the bird stand out more though. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/19/2022 at 11:59 AM, lonestranger said:

Do you have a protective filter attached to your lens, @BlueJay? I ask because of the way the texture (for lack of a better word) of the background looks. If you do have a lens filter attached, I'd suggest removing it and comparing some similarly composed photos with and without the filter. While I like the idea of an extra layer of protection on a lens, I have found that I don't like the effect the filter has on my images. If you don't have a lens filter attached, this won't apply to you but maybe others might consider whether a protective lens is worth it. I was always in favour of attaching a lens filter as soon as I bought a new lens, until I took the filter off and noticed the difference, particularly in the backgrounds. If you, or anyone else, has never used a lens without a filter attached to it, I'd suggest trying without a filter for comparison. 

I like your edit over the original and think you did a good job. I'd suggest cropping a little to make the bird stand out more though. 

Thank you for the feedback and advice. I do have a polarizing filter on my lens. Once we get some better weather I'll take it off and take some pictures without to compare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Just now, IKLland said:

Thanks. It doesn’t bother me but I know some people don’t like super closeups. 
 

What do you think of the rest of the adjustments?

It's not that I don't like all closeups, it's just that the quality makes it obvious that it was cropped a lot.

I think you've overexposed it a tad.  I don't see much detail in the whites.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IKLland said:

It doesn’t look like it does. Anyone else see over exposure?

I adjusted the highlights a tad since a small portion of the white stripe on the head and an even smaller portion of the whites on the wing were blown out.  But the areas were small enough that I don't know if you can see the difference on your monitor.  Here is my edited version:

**Note:  My monitor is calibrated with a colorimeter but when a file is uploaded to a website the colors may be altered in the process, and the monitor you are viewing it on may affect the colors, as well, if it's not calibrated.

2400.thumb.jpeg.d499add37521e78d76198c81a4909492.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, xpoetmarcr said:

**Note:  My monitor is calibrated with a colorimeter but when a file is uploaded to a website the colors may be altered in the process, and the monitor you are viewing it on may affect the colors, as well, if it's not calibrated.

Your mileage may vary.  Side effects may include bloating, nausea, constipation.  Not all buyers will qualify for 0% financing.  Keep out of reach of children.

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, IKLland said:

@Seanbirds I guess you forgot to give me a few photos to edit, so I thought I’d edit your INCREDIBLE photo! ( if you don’t want me to I can have it deleted). 
 

Poor sharpness due to whatbird image quality. All I did was increase contrast and exposure.B087447E-B0E9-4E68-970A-901E5D9E3E00.thumb.jpeg.cb7b0efc88bce1bcfe4ee05734225e99.jpeg

608BC9A4-FB60-4377-BD0C-E127F91AC094.thumb.jpeg.5de08e7127584f8563da3db7d44a335c.jpeg

Not to be criticizing, but it looks too blown out and oversaturated, IMO. I already edited quite a bit. Maybe the exposure should be a bit higher.

Edited by Seanbirds
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Seanbirds said:

Not to be criticizing, but it looks too blown out and oversaturated.

Brought exposure up to plus 30, and pulled the shadows slider all the way up. It was the lighting that originally made it underexposed, shooting in dark overcast conditions against a white sky. The camera exposes for the sky, so the bird is too dark. 

Edited by IKLland
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

This is a photo from December, but I hadn’t put in the work during editing to make it shine. When you have a bird that’s in the sun, but the background is in the shade, you can get a very cool and unique image. The background resulting is usually pure black without any editing. However, in this case, the bird was in the sun, and half of the background was shaded. This made the photo look very awkward, and the exposure was awful. With some editing, I made it look completely black. This can happen without editing, but in my case I didn’t have the right light. Therefore, I transferred it into my editor, and decreased the brightness of the blacks and the shadows. 
 

Before:  2298205E-CA56-4207-B977-6BEA62103B5A.thumb.jpeg.6ca81f47e2bece58e42abacd825f5946.jpeg

after 

2400?__hstc=264660688.773ffa764557d9e943

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...