Dan P Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 (edited) Taken on 1-5-2022 in the afternoon on the Los Angeles River between Burbank Channel confluence and the Riverside Dr. bridge in Glendale, CA. I usually don't attempt to ID immature gulls (and I think this is one). There were just two gulls standing in the water (a Western and this one) and I'm just curious what this is. I have a couple guesses, but could be way off. I looked away to photograph some other birds and was going to come back to this one to get better shots, but when I turned back it was gone. Edited January 7 by Dan P add photos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasan Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 I'm inclined to call that a Ring-billed 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DLecy Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 It's a Ring-billed Gull. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulK Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 Help me out here please. It doesn't have yellow legs and it doesn't have a pale eye. Does structure and the solid back trump those things? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IKLland Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 10 minutes ago, PaulK said: Help me out here please. It doesn't have yellow legs and it doesn't have a pale eye. Does structure and the solid back trump those things? From all about birds 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulK Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 Interesting, thanks. I'm relying too heavily on Sibley. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hasan Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 Body streaking is too fine for a 4 year gull plus it's just a bit too slight in structure. Cal would be a bit darker 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DLecy Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 In the west, the other bird this one is most likely to be confused with is a Short-billed Gull. It’s not one due to less streaking on the head, particularly the back of the head and nape. Additionally, the bird is molting and its tertials are rather messy looking, whereas a Short-billed Gull’s would appear neater. In better lighting, beak structure and color can also be useful. These are a few of the notions that point to RBGU. The bird doesn’t have a light eye or yellow legs because it’s not an adult. It’s a 1cy. RBGU. With gulls it’s often best to age the bird before you ID it. This helps narrow down your options. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulK Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 Thanks everyone - I mis-ID'd it as a second cycle RBGU hence the questions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DLecy Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 10 hours ago, PaulK said: Thanks everyone - I mis-ID'd it as a second cycle RBGU hence the questions. Note the complete adult like 2nd generation covert feathers and the pale eye on a 2cy RBGU. https://macaulaylibrary.org/asset/403175991 Remember, they are a 3 year gulls, so a 2cy would appear almost adult-like, sans a strong yellow bill with defined dark ring, and white apical spots on the primaries. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.794f975d54384dc6d7196bfc8f15302c.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.